Current:Home > ContactKansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds -SecureNest Finance
Kansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds
View
Date:2025-04-16 10:43:20
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas isn’t enforcing a new law requiring abortion providers to ask patients why they want to terminate their pregnancies, as a legal challenge against that rule and other older requirements makes its way through the courts.
Attorneys for the state and for providers challenging the new law along with other requirements announced a deal Thursday. In return for not enforcing the law, the state will get another four months to develop its defense of the challenged restrictions ahead of a trial now delayed until late June 2025. The agreement was announced during a Zoom hearing in Johnson County District Court in the Kansas City area.
Kansas doesn’t ban most abortions until the 22nd week of pregnancy. Its clinics now see thousands of patients from other states with near bans on abortion, most notably Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas.
Last fall, District Judge K. Christopher Jayaram blocked enforcement of requirements that include rules spelling out what providers must tell their patients, and a longstanding requirement that patients wait 24 hours after consulting a provider to undergo a procedure. On July 1, he allowed the providers to add a challenge to the new reporting law to their existing lawsuit rather than making them file a separate case.
The new law was supposed to take effect July 1 and would require providers to ask patients questions from a state script about their reasons for an abortion, although patients wouldn’t be forced to answer. Potential reasons include not being able to afford a child, not wanting a disabled child, not wanting to put schooling or a career on hold, and having an abusive spouse or partner. Clinics would be required to send data about patients’ answers to the state health department for a public report every six months.
“We are relieved that this intrusive law will not take effect,” the Center for Reproductive Rights, the national organization for abortion provider Planned Parenthood and the regional Planned Parenthood affiliate said in a joint statement. “This law would have forced abortion providers to collect deeply personal information — an unjustifiable invasion of patient privacy that has nothing to do with people’s health.”
Kansas already collects data about each abortion, such as the method and the week of pregnancy, but abortion opponents argue that having more information will aid in setting policies for helping pregnant women and new mothers. The Republican-controlled Legislature enacted the law over a veto from Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.
At least eight other states have such reporting requirements, but the Kansas Supreme Court declared in 2019 that the state constitution protects access to abortion as a part of a “fundamental” right to bodily autonomy. In August 2022, Kansas voters decisively rejected a proposed amendment to say that the constitution doesn’t grant any right to abortion access.
The trial of the providers’ lawsuit had been set for late February 2025 before Jayaram delayed it in responded to the parties’ deal.
“The state is prepared to accept an agreement not to enforce the new law until the final judgment, provided that we get a schedule that accommodates the record that we think we need to develop in this case,” said Lincoln Wilson, a senior counsel for the anti-abortion Alliance Defending Freedom, which is leading the state’s defense of its laws.
Abortion providers suggested July 1 that the state wouldn’t enforce the new reporting requirement while the lawsuit proceeded, but the health department did not confirm that when reporters asked about it.
veryGood! (53)
Related
- Realtor group picks top 10 housing hot spots for 2025: Did your city make the list?
- Queen Charlotte's Tunji Kasim Explains How the Show Mirrors Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's Story
- Today’s Climate: May 19, 2010
- Puerto Rico: Hurricane Maria Laid Bare Existing ‘Inequalities and Injustices’
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- Missing resident from Davenport, Iowa, building collapse found dead, officials confirm
- 10 Sweet Treats to Send Mom Right in Time for Mother's Day
- Trump Nominee to Lead Climate Agency Supported Privatizing U.S. Weather Data
- Former Danish minister for Greenland discusses Trump's push to acquire island
- States with the toughest abortion laws have the weakest maternal supports, data shows
Ranking
- Could your smelly farts help science?
- Ice Loss and the Polar Vortex: How a Warming Arctic Fuels Cold Snaps
- Climate Change Is Happening in the U.S. Now, Federal Report Says — in Charts
- Over-the-counter hearing aids will bring relief, but with some confusion
- Bill Belichick's salary at North Carolina: School releases football coach's contract details
- Tearful Derek Hough Reflects on the Shock of Len Goodman’s Death
- Explosive Growth for LED Lights in Next Decade, Report Says
- China's defense minister defends intercepting U.S. destroyer in Taiwan Strait
Recommendation
New Zealand official reverses visa refusal for US conservative influencer Candace Owens
Jon Bon Jovi Reacts to Criticism Over Son Jake's Engagement to Millie Bobby Brown
Young adults are using marijuana and hallucinogens at the highest rates on record
27 Ways Hot Weather Can Kill You — A Dire Warning for a Warming Planet
Travis Hunter, the 2
Protecting Norfolk from Flooding Won’t Be Cheap: Army Corps Releases Its Plan
Maurice Edwin James “Morey” O’Loughlin
Too Hot to Handle’s Francesca Farago and TikToker Jesse Sullivan Are Engaged